The debate has been going on for decades. Which band is better? The Beatles, with their 4 part harmonies, ability to write some of the most covered songs of the Rock and Roll era and a wizard of a record producer and arranger in George Martin? Or is it The Rolling Stones, with their refusal to compromise when it came to their Blues roots, having one of the greatest frontman in music history in Mick Jagger or the fact that they are still together after more than 50 years? No one can come to an agreement on this. And so the debate goes on. I’m going to attempt to shed some light on this topic by offering up some observations I have made over the last 55 years regarding the continuing battle of Beatles vs Stones. Maybe by the end we will have a better idea of who is King...